Acting vs. Waiting to Act
The following aphorism is attributed to Gen. Omar Bradley, a five-star U.S. general who served as field commander in North Africa and Europe during World War II:
"This is as true in everyday life as it is in battle: we are given one life and the decision is ours whether to wait for circumstances to make up our mind, or whether to act and, in acting, to live."
This aphorism contains two main ideas: 1) the implicit idea that each of us has only one life and should choose his course of action wisely; and 2) the explicit idea that it is better to act than to wait for circumstances to dictate one's actions.
Choosing a Course of Action Wisely
Issues drawn from the first idea will focus on the notion that each of us lives only once and for a limited period of time; therefore, every action and decision is important, because none of us gets a "do-over." Such story issues might include:
- Recognizing the fleeting nature of one's life
- Living circumspectly to make the most of one's time on Earth
- Using one's time on Earth in the service of others
- Working to create the life that you want to live
- Working to create the world that you want those who remain after you die to inhabit
And because the issue does not, in itself, contain the value judgment of the theme (which is the job of the proposition), one could just as easily draw from this aphorism the issue:
- Living with selfish abandon to derive the most personal pleasure from one's limited time on Earth
To argue for or against doing so in the specific expression of the proposition.
Acting to Get Ahead of Circumstances
The second idea addressed by the aphorism involves the advisability of acting versus waiting for circumstances to restrict or dictate one's actions. These might be stated most simply as:
- Acting decisively before a situation has fully developed
- Waiting to act until circumstances restrict or define one's possible choices
The aphorism cited above advises clearly in favor of the first expression of the issue and in opposition of the second. But valid arguments can be made in favor of each.
The first statement, for example, might be advisable in life-and-death struggles wherein the failure to act immediately means certain peril or death. But it might be inadvisable in circumstances where not enough information is known to act wisely—and where foolish and hot-headed action can result in a poor outcome for the main character.
The second statement might be inadvisable in situations where the positive alternatives diminish with time but might be advisable in circumstances that require complete knowledge to choose wisely between alternatives. After all, the great NBA basketball player Michael Jordan often spoke of the wisdom of being patient and "letting the game come to him."
Regardless of which issue you choose to employ as the basis of a story, the story itself can be developed by means of the four-step procedure outlined in Part Three of Discovering the Soul of Your Story—that is: developing the endeavor, creating the proposition, extracting the main character, and building the story.
For More Information
For details regarding the concepts and terms mentioned in this article, please refer to the resource materials.